NAICS 9261 · Sub-Industry Deep-Dive · Public Administration
Administration of General Economic Programs — AI Adoption Analysis
Aggregate AI adoption statistics for companies in the Administration of General Economic Programs sub-industry, computed from Meo Advisors' dataset of US-scored firms.
217 companies
51.2 avg score
43 states
112 cities
$27.0M median savings
3,000 median employees
AI Adoption Score Distribution · 217 companies scored
0
Grade A
80 – 100
4
Grade B
72 – 79
38
Grade C
64 – 71
175
Grade D
< 64
Scores reflect operational readiness for AI agent deployment across scheduling, intake, billing, and customer communication workflows.
Top Administration of General Economic Programs companies by AI adoption score
#1u.s. department of energy (doe)B78/100#2National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationB75/100#3the world bankB75/100#4u.s. department of homeland securityB75/100#5Seattle Housing AuthorityC68/100#6baltimore district, u.s. army corps of engineersC65/100#7bureau of ocean energy managementC65/100#8california department of tax and fee administrationC65/100#9chicago department of transportationC65/100#10consumer financial protection bureauC65/100#11cybersecurity and infrastructure security agencyC65/100#12department of the air force office of small business programsC65/100#13energycommunitiesC65/100#14femaC65/100#15international u.s. operations | u.s. reporting agencyC65/100#16joint chiefs of global tax enforcementC65/100#17ncdotC65/100#18new york state department of financial servicesC65/100#19nys department of transportationC65/100#20office of natural resources revenueC65/100#21savannah district, u.s. army corps of engineersC65/100#22savannah river nuclear solutionsC65/100#23texas department of transportationC65/100#24us army corps of engineersC65/100#25u.s. army corps of engineers, detroit districtC65/100#26u.s. army corps of engineers great lakes and ohio river divisionC65/100#27u.s. army corps of engineers, jacksonville districtC65/100#28u.s. army corps of engineers, little rock districtC65/100#29u.s. army corps of engineers, new orleans districtC65/100#30u.s. army corps of engineers south pacific divisionC65/100#31u.s. army corps of engineers, tulsa districtC65/100#32us army corps of engineers wilmington districtC65/100#33u.s. commercial serviceC65/100#34u.s. commodity futures trading commissionC65/100#35u.s. customs and border protectionC65/100#36usda foreign agricultural service (fas)C65/100#37u.s. department of commerceC65/100#38u.s. department of transportationC65/100#39usps oigC65/100#40u.s. securities and exchange commissionC65/100#41washington state department of commerceC65/100#42washington state department of transportationC65/100#43new york city economic development corporationD62/100#44university of maryland - department of transportation servicesD62/100#45california department of managed health careD60/100#46district department of transportation (ddot)D60/100#47maryland state highway administrationD60/100#48mississippi development authorityD60/100#49new jersey economic development authority (njeda)D60/100#50new jersey turnpike authorityD60/100#51north carolina department of commerceD60/100#52nyserdaD60/100#53ontario economic development agencyD60/100#54usda animal and plant health inspection service (aphis)D60/100#55usda economic research serviceD60/100#56usda-fsisD60/100#57u.s. department of laborD60/100#58utah department of commerceD60/100#59utah department of transportationD60/100#60washington state department of licensingD60/100#61california department of pesticide regulationD58/100#62maryland department of commerceD58/100#63u.s. international trade commissionD58/100#64arizona department of transportationD55/100#65bureau of economic analysisD55/100#66california energy commissionD55/100#67california governor's office of business and economic development (go-biz)D55/100#68delaware river and bay authorityD55/100#69empire state developmentD55/100#70florida department of economic opportunityD55/100#71Global CommunitiesD55/100#72iowa department of transportationD55/100#73maryland department of transportationD55/100#74maryland transportation authorityD55/100#75minnesota department of transportationD55/100#76new york state department of public serviceD55/100#77nys department of agriculture and marketsD55/100#78ohio department of developmentD55/100#79pennsylvania department of community & economic developmentD55/100#80pennsylvania department of transportation (penndot)D55/100#81public protection & regulation cabinet, kentuckyD55/100#82virginia department of agriculture and consumer servicesD55/100#83west virginia dotD55/100#84michigan economic development corporationD52/100#85invest elk grove - elk grove, ca's office of economic developmentD50/100#86layton city economic developmentD50/100#87maryland cannabis administrationD50/100#88maryland department of agricultureD50/100#89ohio dept of agricultureD50/100#90public parking authority of pittsburghD50/100#91sumter county economic developmentD50/100#92texas department of licensing and regulationD50/100#93west virginia division of economic developmentD50/100#94california board of registered nursingD48/100#95cameron county international bridge systemD48/100#96florida public service commissionD48/100#97fredericksburg, virginia economic development & tourismD48/100#98gvec economic developmentD48/100#99idaho division of occupational and professional licensesD48/100#100illinois department of financial and professional regulationD48/100
Sibling sub-industries under Public Administration
Top cities for Administration of General Economic Programs
washington, District Of Columbia
sacramento, California
columbus, Ohio
baltimore, Maryland
tallahassee, Florida
Methodology
Scores are computed using Meo Advisors' proprietary AI adoption model evaluating public digital signals (job postings, tech stack, content, and product velocity). NAICS assignment is based on primary industry classification from the company's public filings and directory entries.