NAICS 9241 · Sub-Industry Deep-Dive · Public Administration
Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs — AI Adoption Analysis
Aggregate AI adoption statistics for companies in the Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs sub-industry, computed from Meo Advisors' dataset of US-scored firms.
110 companies
48.9 avg score
35 states
72 cities
$16.0M median savings
1,875 median employees
AI Adoption Score Distribution · 110 companies scored
0
Grade A
80 – 100
0
Grade B
72 – 79
11
Grade C
64 – 71
99
Grade D
< 64
Scores reflect operational readiness for AI agent deployment across scheduling, intake, billing, and customer communication workflows.
Top Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs companies by AI adoption score
#1california air resources boardC65/100#2california department of forestry and fire protection (cal fire)C65/100#3california department of water resourcesC65/100#4national interagency fire centerC65/100#5ohio epaC65/100#6south coast air quality management districtC65/100#7south florida water management districtC65/100#8texas commission on environmental qualityC65/100#9usdaC65/100#10usda forest serviceC65/100#11us environmental protection agency (epa)C65/100#12florida department of environmental protectionD60/100#13nys department of environmental conservationD60/100#14us army corps of engineers, ny districtD60/100#15washington state department of ecologyD60/100#16wyoming department of environmental qualityD60/100#17bay area air districtD58/100#18cleveland metroparksD58/100#19arizona department of environmental quality adeqD55/100#20dc department of public worksD55/100#21florida lake management societyD55/100#22georgia department of natural resources wildlife resources divisionD55/100#23n.c. wildlife resources commissionD55/100#24Ohio Department of Natural ResourcesD55/100#25san antonio river authorityD55/100#26u.s. international boundary and water commissionD55/100#27virginia department of wildlife resourcesD55/100#28washington department of fish & wildlifeD55/100#29washington state department of natural resourcesD55/100#30sonoma county water agencyD52/100#31nevada department of wildlifeD50/100#32oc waste & recycling, county of orangeD50/100#33riverside county flood control and water conservation districtD50/100#34san joaquin valley air pollution control districtD50/100#35southeast louisiana flood protection authority eastD50/100#36utah department of environmental qualityD50/100#37middle rio grande conservancy districtD48/100#38oklahoma department of wildlife conservationD48/100#39pennsylvania fish and boat commissionD48/100#40trinity river authority of texasD48/100#41arizona game and fish departmentD45/100#42arkansas game and fish commissionD45/100#43bureau of land managementD45/100#44california conservation corpsD45/100#45california department of conservationD45/100#46california department of fish and wildlifeD45/100#47california department of housing & community developmentD45/100#48california integrated waste management boardD45/100#49calrecycleD45/100#50chicago park districtD45/100#51colorado parks and wildlifeD45/100#52cooperative agricultural support services authorityD45/100#53cuyahoga metropolitan housing authorityD45/100#54cwea (california water environment association)D45/100#55delaware department of natural resources and environmental controlD45/100#56fish & wildlife resources, kentucky department ofD45/100#57florida department of agriculture and consumer servicesD45/100#58florida forest serviceD45/100#59forest preserve district of dupage countyD45/100#60georgia forestry commissionD45/100#61houston public worksD45/100#62idaho fish and gameD45/100#63Imagine One Technology & ManagementD45/100#64iowa department of natural resourcesD45/100#65kentucky energy and environment cabinetD45/100#66king county housing authorityD45/100#67los angeles county housing authorityD45/100#68maryland department of natural resourcesD45/100#69morro bay ocean fresh water coalitionD45/100#70national park serviceD45/100#71nebraska's natural resources districtsD45/100#72nebraska water environment associationD45/100#73new hampshire rivers councilD45/100#74new york state housing finance agency/state of new york mortgage agencyD45/100#75opportunity home san antonioD45/100#76oregon department of fish and wildlifeD45/100#77san josé environmental servicesD45/100#78sierra club miami groupD45/100#79south carolina department of natural resourcesD45/100#80southwest florida water management districtD45/100#81st. johns river water management districtD45/100#82tennessee wildlife resource agencyD45/100#83texas a&m forest serviceD45/100#84texas parks and wildlife departmentD45/100#85the housing authority of the city of hobokenD45/100#86undp small grants programmeD45/100#87usda farm production and conservation business centerD45/100#88utah conservation corpsD45/100#89utah department of natural resourcesD45/100#90utah division of wildlife resourcesD45/100#91virginia department of conservation and recreationD45/100#92virginia department of environmental qualityD45/100#93virginia department of forestryD45/100#94washington state department of agricultureD45/100#95Wisconsin Association of Land Conservation EmployeesD45/100#96wisconsin department of agriculture, trade and consumer protectionD45/100#97wisconsin department of natural resources (dnr)D45/100#98forest preserves of cook countyD42/100#99georgia environmental protection divisionD42/100#100gila national forestD42/100
Top cities for Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs
sacramento, California
washington, District Of Columbia
boise, Idaho
tallahassee, Florida
Methodology
Scores are computed using Meo Advisors' proprietary AI adoption model evaluating public digital signals (job postings, tech stack, content, and product velocity). NAICS assignment is based on primary industry classification from the company's public filings and directory entries.