NAICS 9211 · Sub-Industry Deep-Dive · Public Administration
Executive Offices — AI Adoption Analysis
Aggregate AI adoption statistics for companies in the Executive Offices sub-industry, computed from Meo Advisors' dataset of US-scored firms.
2,607 companies
48.2 avg score
53 states
1707 cities
$15.0M median savings
750 median employees
2mo median payback
AI Adoption Score Distribution · 2,607 companies scored
5
Grade A
80 – 100
31
Grade B
72 – 79
187
Grade C
64 – 71
2,384
Grade D
< 64
Scores reflect operational readiness for AI agent deployment across scheduling, intake, billing, and customer communication workflows.
Top enterprise tech stacks in Executive Offices
- slack · 1 companies
Top Executive Offices companies by AI adoption score
#1Boulder CountyB80/100#2City of Fort WayneB80/100#3City of Providence HomeB80/100#4CodotB80/100#5technology transformation services (tts)B80/100#6City of ArlingtonB79/100#7NcagrB79/100#8City of Brockton, MAB76/100#9City of MinneapolisB76/100#10GadnrB76/100#11Larimer CountyB76/100#12Montgomery CountyB76/100#13Wichita Falls, TXB76/100#14WoburnmaB76/100#15City of ChampaignB75/100#16City of Lancaster PAB75/100#17OregonmetroB75/100#18u.s. census bureauB75/100#19EbparksC74/100#20MtrevenueC74/100#21Alabama Department of Public HealthC73/100#22Anaheim, CAC73/100#23AocC73/100#24Charleston, SCC73/100#25City Of ManchesterC73/100#26CstxC73/100#27DeschutesC73/100#28EdisonnjC73/100#29Everett, WAC73/100#30Harford County, MDC73/100#31Ho-Chunk Inc.C73/100#32Ingham CountyC73/100#33People Inc.C73/100#34Talgov.comC73/100#35Travis County HomepageC73/100#36Welcome to Chattanooga.govC73/100#37A2govC71/100#38AlamedacaC71/100#39AllentownpaC71/100#40City of Anderson SCC71/100#41GreshamoregonC71/100#42North Port, FLC71/100#43Rockdale CountyC71/100#44Akron, OHC70/100#45Beverly Hills, CAC70/100#46Bloomfield Twp, MIC70/100#47City of AnnistonC70/100#48City of PleasantonC70/100#49City of Worcester, MAC70/100#50Denton CountyC70/100#51East Lansing, MIC70/100#52ForsythcoC70/100#53Henderson County North CarolinaC70/100#54LarpdC70/100#55New Mexico Department of HealthC70/100#56OntariocaC70/100#57QcoC70/100#58Sb CourtC70/100#59ScdmvonlineC70/100#60Scott County, IowaC70/100#61SfrecparkC70/100#62Town of Scarborough, MaineC70/100#63City of Glasgow, KYC69/100#64City of KennesawC69/100#65City of Mentor, OhioC69/100#66Denver Housing AuthorityC69/100#67HacanetC69/100#68Hamilton County DDSC69/100#69Home ForwardC69/100#70Lakeland Hills Family YMCAC69/100#71San Leandro, CAC69/100#72CityofedinburgC68/100#73City of Hamilton, OHC68/100#74City of SouthfieldC68/100#75Edmond, OKC68/100#76eiaC68/100#77Gilmer County GeorgiaC68/100#78Grafton, MAC68/100#79Leon County GovernmentC68/100#80New Hartford Central School DistrictC68/100#81NormanokC68/100#82RomiC68/100#83TexasagricultureC68/100#84Wayne County, PAC68/100#85Wilmington, NCC68/100#86Atlantawatershed.orgC67/100#87Calvert County, MDC67/100#88CambridgemaC67/100#89DuPage County, ILC67/100#90Frederick County MDC67/100#91GilbertazC67/100#92HumboldtgovC67/100#93JeffcoC67/100#94McCarthy Byrnes ConsultingB-67/100#95NCUAC67/100#96Ramsey CountyC67/100#97SpokanecityC67/100#98Weston, MAC67/100#99Atlanta HousingC66/100#100City of WilliamsportC66/100
Sibling sub-industries under Public Administration
Top cities for Executive Offices
washington, District Of Columbia
sacramento, California
olympia, Washington
albany, New York
Methodology
Scores are computed using Meo Advisors' proprietary AI adoption model evaluating public digital signals (job postings, tech stack, content, and product velocity). NAICS assignment is based on primary industry classification from the company's public filings and directory entries.