NAICS 9251 · Sub-Industry Deep-Dive · Public Administration
Administration of Housing Programs — AI Adoption Analysis
Aggregate AI adoption statistics for companies in the Administration of Housing Programs sub-industry, computed from Meo Advisors' dataset of US-scored firms.
56 companies
48.9 avg score
23 states
51 cities
$10.0M median savings
3,000 median employees
AI Adoption Score Distribution · 56 companies scored
0
Grade A
80 – 100
0
Grade B
72 – 79
1
Grade C
64 – 71
55
Grade D
< 64
Scores reflect operational readiness for AI agent deployment across scheduling, intake, billing, and customer communication workflows.
Top Administration of Housing Programs companies by AI adoption score
#1greenville city economic development corporationC65/100#2ASTHOD60/100#3charlotte county, florida economic developmentD60/100#4city of glendale economic developmentD60/100#5lake county economic developmentD60/100#6san diego housing commissionD60/100#7volusia county economic developmentD60/100#8illinois housing development authorityD58/100#9minnesota housingD58/100#10haclaD55/100#11lane council of governmentsD55/100#12sacramento housing and redevelopment agencyD55/100#13west 192 development authorityD55/100#14housing authority of the birmingham districtD52/100#15worcester housing authorityD52/100#16fresno county public works & planningD50/100#17housing authority county of san joaquinD50/100#18kentucky housing corporationD50/100#19masshousingD50/100#20metropolitan development and housing agencyD50/100#21minneapolis public housing authorityD50/100#22jacksonville housing authorityD48/100#23maryland department of housing and community development (dhcd)D48/100#24newark housing authorityD48/100#25new jersey housing and mortgage finance agencyD48/100#26norfolk redevelopment and housing authorityD48/100#27oklahoma city housing authorityD48/100#28texas department of housing and community affairsD48/100#29akron metropolitan housing authorityD45/100#30champaign county regional planning commissionD45/100#31charlotte housing authorityD45/100#32chicago housing authorityD45/100#33city of avondale economic developmentD45/100#34city of goodyear economic developmentD45/100#35city of miramar economic development and housing departmentD45/100#36city of north port economic developmentD45/100#37columbia housing authorityD45/100#38creative options, inc.D45/100#39dc housing authorityD45/100#40huntsville housing authorityD45/100#41new york state division of housing and community renewalD45/100#42new york state homes & community renewalD45/100#43rochester housing authorityD45/100#44san bernardino county economic development departmentD45/100#45san jose office of economic development and cultural affairsD45/100#46sevier county economic developmentD45/100#47the villages®D45/100#48usda rural developmentD45/100#49u.s. department of housing and urban developmentD45/100#50housing opportunity management enterprisesD42/100#51national reentry resource centerD42/100#52san francisco department of building inspectionD42/100#53southern nevada regional housing authorityD42/100#54st. paul public housing agencyD42/100#55housing authority of baltimore cityD40/100#56united states mintD40/100
Sibling sub-industries under Public Administration
Top cities for Administration of Housing Programs
washington, District Of Columbia
chicago, Illinois
st. paul, Minnesota
Methodology
Scores are computed using Meo Advisors' proprietary AI adoption model evaluating public digital signals (job postings, tech stack, content, and product velocity). NAICS assignment is based on primary industry classification from the company's public filings and directory entries.