Skip to main content

Revenue cycle

Find where you lose money, payer by payer.

Agents read every remittance, fix preventable denials, draft winnable appeals and flag underpayments. Coders, clinicians and your contracting lead decide.

Request your free outside-in audit

Two reasons to look at the revenue cycle now

  • Prior authorization goes electronic in 2027

    Beginning 1 January 2027, Medicare Advantage, Medicaid and federal exchange plans covered by CMS-0057-F must support prior authorization through standard electronic interfaces (FHIR APIs).

    CMS, Interoperability and Prior Authorization Final Rule (CMS-0057-F), 2024.

  • Few prior-authorization denials are appealed

    Only 11.5% of Medicare Advantage prior-authorization denials were appealed in 2024. Of those appeals, 80.7% were fully or partly overturned.

    KFF, Medicare Advantage insurers made nearly 53 million prior authorization determinations in 2024, published 2026.

  • The outside view can't see your denials. In discovery, under the data agreements you require, we read your remittance files and show where you lose money, payer by payer, before any target is set.

What changes, and who decides

Drag the divider to compare today with Meo. The picture and the record are illustrative.

A billing office desk with stacks of printed remittance pages in a wire tray, envelopes, and a monitor showing a long queue as pale bars.
The same desk with the tray empty, one folder of appeals to sign, and the monitor showing a short grouped chart.
Every remittance file

Illustrative example, Denials · by payer and reason: Payer A · missing authorization, Payer B · coverage, Payer C · coding edit.

Today

Denials are worked oldest first, and few are appealed. Underpayments and takebacks are hard to spot across thousands of remittance lines.

With Meo, illustrative

Agents read each remittance file, group denials by payer and reason, fix the causes of preventable denials before the next claims go out, draft appeals for the winnable ones and flag payments below your contract rates.

Stays with your people

A certified coder approves any code change that raises reimbursement. A clinician signs every medical-necessity appeal. Your contracting lead approves every payer dispute.

Full detail, measures and sources

What we measure
Initial denial rate by reason, final write-offs, appeal overturn rate, days in accounts receivable (A/R) and takebacks, against your own baseline.
Common systems
Your practice-management system and EHR · your clearinghouse (Availity, Stedi and others) · payer portals · your bank deposit file
Formats
X12 837, 835, 277CA and 278 · CARC and RARC codes · FHIR prior-authorization APIs from 1 January 2027
  • The average initial denial rate was 11.6% in 2025, in data from more than 2,300 hospitals and 375,000 physicians. Kodiak Solutions, 2026.
  • Payer takebacks rose to 1.57% of A/R in the first half of 2026, from 1.38% in the first half of 2025. Kodiak Solutions, 2026.
  • Contesting a denied claim cost hospitals $57.23 on average in 2023. Premier, 2025.
  • During the 2024 Change Healthcare outage, 67% of hospitals responding to an AHA survey said switching clearinghouses was difficult or very difficult. American Hospital Association, 2024.
  • Claims attachments now have a HIPAA standard, with compliance due 26 May 2028 (CMS-0053-F). CMS, 2026.

Revenue cycle, up close

What changes

Eligibility runs at booking and again before each visit, so a lapsed plan or the wrong payer is caught before the patient arrives.

What stays

Your clearinghouse and payer portals

Who decides

Your benefits team confirms anything quoted as cost.

What we measure

Denials for coverage reasons (CARC 22, 27, 109 and 242)

Standards and sources

X12 270/271; CARC code list, X12

1 of 5

How we count results

Pilot: the first workflow live for a limited set of sites, hours or request types, ending in a go or no-go decision. Rollout: the rest of the agreed scope, wave by wave, each after your sign-off.

Blank on purpose.

A baseline that hasn't been measured stays blank, and a target is only a proposal until an owner on your side accepts it.

Every rowYour baseline Measured in discoveryDay-90 and month-12 targets Set with youOwner Named by you
Scorecard template. Baselines are measured in discovery.
FunctionWhat we measureHow it's countedBaseline · targets · owner
Revenue cycleInitial denial rate by reason Your baseline: measured in discovery. Day-90 target: set with you. Month-12 target: set with you. Owner: named by you.Denied claim lines divided by submitted lines, by payer and reason code, using HFMA definitions

Where revenue leaks, payer by payer

Revenue cycle results come down to yield: what you bill, what you collect and what you keep. This article sets out where money is lost, which formats decide payer outcomes, where agents act in the cycle, and which decisions stay with coders, clinicians and your contracting lead. The figures below are industry averages from named sources. Your own remittance files set your baseline.

Denials are high, and more money moves after payment

Kodiak Solutions, drawing on data from more than 2,300 hospitals and 375,000 physicians, put the average initial denial rate at 11.6% in 2025, up from 11.4% in 2024 (Kodiak Solutions via Business Wire, 2026). In the first half of 2026 initial denials fell, but payer takebacks rose to 1.57% of accounts receivable (A/R), from 1.38% in the first half of 2025 (Kodiak Solutions, 2026). A falling denial rate can sit alongside money taken back months later, so we watch both.

Many denials are preventable, and many are winnable

Many denials start at registration. Change Healthcare's 2020 denials index found registration and eligibility to be the largest cause, at about 27% of denials, and judged 86% of denials potentially avoidable (HFMA, 2020). That data is now six years old.

Many others can be won on appeal, yet few are appealed. KFF found that Medicare Advantage insurers fully or partially denied 7.7% of nearly 53 million prior authorization requests in 2024. Only 11.5% of those denials were appealed, and 80.7% of the appeals were fully or partially overturned (KFF, 2026).

What a denial costs to work

Premier's survey of 280 hospitals put the average cost of contesting a denied claim at $57.23 in 2023, up from $43.84 in 2022, and found about 70% of contested claims were eventually paid (Premier, 2025). For physician practices, an older MGMA figure puts the cost at about $25 per reworked claim, and found that more than half of denied claims are never reworked (AAFP Family Practice Management, 2015). Treat that figure as dated.

Where agents act in the cycle

Agents work inside the systems you already run: your practice-management system and EHR, your clearinghouse, payer portals and your bank deposit file. Across the cycle they:

  1. Registration: read card images, normalize names and dates of birth, and flag a missing secondary plan.
  2. Eligibility: run the electronic check at scheduling and before each visit, read the service-level benefits, and route the claim to the right plan and payer ID.
  3. Prior authorization: detect when one is needed, assemble the packet from the chart, submit it, track it, and warn before authorized units or dates run out.
  4. Coding: suggest codes with a link to the supporting text in the note, and check them against the National Correct Coding Initiative edits (CMS, updated quarterly).
  5. Scrubbing and submission: apply payer-specific edits learned from your own remittance history, and work 277CA rejections every day, because a rejected claim never reached adjudication.
  6. Remittance posting: post each 835, match it to its bank deposit, and compare allowed amounts with your contract rates to find underpayments and takebacks.
  7. Appeals: rank denials by amount, likely outcome and cost to work, assemble a packet that cites the chart and the payer's own policy, draft the letter and track the deadline.
  8. Patient statements: produce plain-language statements and answer balance questions.

Each action is logged with the evidence it used.

The formats that decide outcomes

Claims move as X12 transactions: 837 claims, 277CA acknowledgements, 278 authorization requests, and 835 remittances that carry Claim Adjustment Reason Codes (X12, 2025 list). Three dates matter now:

  • Beginning 1 January 2027, payers covered by CMS-0057-F, including Medicare Advantage plans, Medicaid and CHIP programs and plans, and plans on the federal exchanges, must run FHIR prior authorization APIs (CMS, 2024).
  • Claims attachments now have a HIPAA standard, with compliance due 26 May 2028 (CMS, 2026).
  • In December 2025, X12 recommended that every HIPAA-mandated transaction move to version 008060 (X12, 2025). We found no proposed federal rule as of October 2026.

Because of that last point, we treat the transaction version as configuration.

Keep a second route to every payer

During the 2024 Change Healthcare outage, 67% of hospitals responding to an AHA survey said switching clearinghouses was difficult or very difficult (American Hospital Association, 2024). We keep a secondary clearinghouse or a direct payer connection enrolled, and reconcile submitted, acknowledged and paid claims daily so a gap shows up quickly. The system page explains how connections are set up.

Where people stay

  • A certified coder approves any code change that raises reimbursement.
  • A clinician signs every medical-necessity appeal, and peer-to-peer calls stay with clinicians.
  • Your contracting lead approves every payer dispute.
  • Write-offs above a threshold you set need approval.

Appeals depend on documentation that supports the billed service, which is what our clinical audit checks each night. How people review agents' work is on the human review page, and patient-side coverage checks start at intake.

What we measure

We track initial denial rate by reason, final write-offs, appeal overturn rate, days in A/R and takebacks, using HFMA's MAP Key definitions so the figures compare with industry data (HFMA, current definitions). For physician practices, AAFP guidance puts days in A/R under 50 at a minimum, with 30 to 40 preferable (AAFP, current guidance).

We set no target until your own 837 and 835 files show where you start. How fees work is on our pricing page.

Start with the free audit

Request your free outside-in audit

Free and based on public information, with a first reply within 24 hours and the audit typically within a week.

See a sample audit (synthetic)

Call our AI agent +1 (844) 960-3055