Skip to main content

Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is qwen's model. On the un-leaked meo benchmark it ranks #81 of 82 with 39.3% accuracy and an Effective Value (𝕍) of 0.0000 β€” earning a correct answer for about $0.0228 in 290s each.

as of 2026-10-18

meo rank
#81
of 82
Accuracy
39.3%
overall
𝕍 index (top=100)
<0.001
raw 𝕍 0.0000 Β· N=10
$ / correct
$0.0228
290s each

Per-domain accuracy

101 correct of 250 questions asked across 11 domains Β· answer rate 100% Β· macro accuracy 27.4%. Headline accuracy is micro-averaged per meo’s methodology; per-domain question counts (correct/asked) are shown so you can judge significance.

Base-rate bias
76%31/41
Watson-Glaser
75%3/4
Framework bias
67%2/3
Theory of mind
67%2/3
Perceptual illusions
48%49/102
CSP (unsatisfiable)
25%4/16
Regex automaton
19%3/16
Logic / math / CS
18%6/34
Tape machine
7%1/15
State tracking
0%0/1
Long arithmetic
0%0/15

Efficiency

Cost per correct
$0.0228
Seconds per correct
290
Tokens per correct
22,255
Correct answers
101 / 250
Total benchmark cost
$2.30
Avg tokens / item
8,991

Model details

Released
2026-02-25
Weights
Open
Context
262K
Max output
16K
Knowledge cutoff
β€”
Price in
$0.15/M
Price out
$1.00/M
Modality
text+image+video->text

Sources: openrouter Β· meo

FAQ

How accurate is Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B scores 39.3% overall on the meo benchmark (rank #81 of 82), an un-leaked private holdout graded objective-first.

What is Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B's Effective Value?

Its Effective Value (𝕍) is 0.0000 at N=10, Ο‰=1, Ξ΄=1.5 β€” a fused metric of accuracy, speed, cost, and error-cascade. 𝕍 rankings shift with task depth.

How much does Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B cost per correct answer?

About $0.0228 per correct answer (22,255 tokens, 290 seconds each) at benchmark-time pricing via OpenRouter.

Is Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B open weights?

Yes β€” Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is released with open weights.

Benchmark updates affecting this model

  • 2026-06-09majorlogic_math_cs ground truth was broken β€” culled and rebuilt with solver-verified items

    A 5-lab frontier jury revealed that 29 of 37 LLM-authored logic_math_cs items had broken ground truth: on most, five independent frontier models unanimously concluded the clue sets were contradictory while the stored answer claimed a number, and on eight, all five agreed on the SAME different number (author arithmetic errors). Models were being marked wrong for being right. The 29 were retired (full audit published in the repo) and the domain rebuilt with generator-as-oracle items: an embedded constraint solver PROVES each puzzle has exactly one solution (or provably none), verified by an independent exhaustive enumerator. A 3-round difficulty study found frontier models saturate consistent human-scale logic puzzles, so items use anonymous global constraints and carry a measured difficulty gradient.

  • 2026-06-08majorCorrected base_bias grading (LLM-equivalence judge fix)

    The LLM-equivalence grader uses a reasoning model whose verdict token budget was too small, so its YES/NO answer was emitted as empty and silently counted as a failure. This understated the base_bias domain to ~7% for every model when the true accuracy is ~85-90%. We raised the judge budget, excluded its reasoning tokens from the verdict, switched to verbosity-robust conclusion matching, and re-graded the whole board.

Full benchmark changelog β†’

Embed this ranking

Show Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B’s meo rank on your site β€” the badge links back here.

Related: all Qwen (Alibaba) models Β· Base-rate bias domain Β· best Effective Value Β· biggest movers Β· methodology Β· full leaderboard.