Skip to main content

Perceptron: Perceptron Mk1

Perceptron: Perceptron Mk1 is perceptron's model. On the un-leaked meo benchmark it ranks #49 of 82 with 57.7% accuracy and an Effective Value (𝕍) of 0.0023 β€” earning a correct answer for about $0.0009 in 18s each.

as of 2026-10-18

meo rank
#49
of 82
Accuracy
57.7%
overall
𝕍 index (top=100)
0.055
raw 𝕍 0.0023 Β· N=10
$ / correct
$0.0009
18s each

Per-domain accuracy

144 correct of 250 questions asked across 11 domains Β· answer rate 100% Β· macro accuracy 58.7%. Headline accuracy is micro-averaged per meo’s methodology; per-domain question counts (correct/asked) are shown so you can judge significance.

Tape machine
100%15/15
Base-rate bias
85%35/41
Regex automaton
69%11/16
Framework bias
67%2/3
Theory of mind
67%2/3
Perceptual illusions
56%57/102
Watson-Glaser
50%2/4
CSP (unsatisfiable)
44%7/16
Long arithmetic
33%5/15
Logic / math / CS
24%8/34
State tracking
0%0/1

Efficiency

Cost per correct
$0.0009
Seconds per correct
18
Tokens per correct
569
Correct answers
144 / 250
Total benchmark cost
$0.13
Avg tokens / item
328

Model details

Released
2026-05-12
Weights
β€”
Context
33K
Max output
8K
Knowledge cutoff
β€”
Price in
$0.15/M
Price out
$1.50/M
Modality
text+image+video->text

Sources: openrouter Β· meo

FAQ

How accurate is Perceptron: Perceptron Mk1?

Perceptron: Perceptron Mk1 scores 57.7% overall on the meo benchmark (rank #49 of 82), an un-leaked private holdout graded objective-first.

What is Perceptron: Perceptron Mk1's Effective Value?

Its Effective Value (𝕍) is 0.0023 at N=10, Ο‰=1, Ξ΄=1.5 β€” a fused metric of accuracy, speed, cost, and error-cascade. 𝕍 rankings shift with task depth.

How much does Perceptron: Perceptron Mk1 cost per correct answer?

About $0.0009 per correct answer (569 tokens, 18 seconds each) at benchmark-time pricing via OpenRouter.

Is Perceptron: Perceptron Mk1 open weights?

Open-weights status for Perceptron: Perceptron Mk1 is not recorded.

Benchmark updates affecting this model

  • 2026-06-09majorlogic_math_cs ground truth was broken β€” culled and rebuilt with solver-verified items

    A 5-lab frontier jury revealed that 29 of 37 LLM-authored logic_math_cs items had broken ground truth: on most, five independent frontier models unanimously concluded the clue sets were contradictory while the stored answer claimed a number, and on eight, all five agreed on the SAME different number (author arithmetic errors). Models were being marked wrong for being right. The 29 were retired (full audit published in the repo) and the domain rebuilt with generator-as-oracle items: an embedded constraint solver PROVES each puzzle has exactly one solution (or provably none), verified by an independent exhaustive enumerator. A 3-round difficulty study found frontier models saturate consistent human-scale logic puzzles, so items use anonymous global constraints and carry a measured difficulty gradient.

  • 2026-06-08majorCorrected base_bias grading (LLM-equivalence judge fix)

    The LLM-equivalence grader uses a reasoning model whose verdict token budget was too small, so its YES/NO answer was emitted as empty and silently counted as a failure. This understated the base_bias domain to ~7% for every model when the true accuracy is ~85-90%. We raised the judge budget, excluded its reasoning tokens from the verdict, switched to verbosity-robust conclusion matching, and re-graded the whole board.

Full benchmark changelog β†’

Embed this ranking

Show Perceptron: Perceptron Mk1’s meo rank on your site β€” the badge links back here.

Related: all Perceptron models Β· Tape-machine simulation domain Β· best Effective Value Β· biggest movers Β· methodology Β· full leaderboard.