Skip to main content

Amazon: Nova Lite 1.0

Amazon: Nova Lite 1.0 is amazon's model. On the un-leaked meo benchmark it ranks #80 of 82 with 39.7% accuracy and an Effective Value (𝕍) of 0.0005 β€” earning a correct answer for about $0.0002 in 5.31s each.

as of 2026-10-18

meo rank
#80
of 82
Accuracy
39.7%
overall
𝕍 index (top=100)
0.012
raw 𝕍 0.0005 Β· N=10
$ / correct
$0.0002
5.31s each

Per-domain accuracy

98 correct of 250 questions asked across 11 domains Β· answer rate 100% Β· macro accuracy 30.3%. Headline accuracy is micro-averaged per meo’s methodology; per-domain question counts (correct/asked) are shown so you can judge significance.

Base-rate bias
68%28/41
Perceptual illusions
48%49/102
Tape machine
33%5/15
Framework bias
33%1/3
Theory of mind
33%1/3
Watson-Glaser
25%1/4
Regex automaton
19%3/16
Logic / math / CS
18%6/34
Long arithmetic
13%2/15
CSP (unsatisfiable)
13%2/16
State tracking
0%0/1

Efficiency

Cost per correct
$0.0002
Seconds per correct
5.31
Tokens per correct
666
Correct answers
98 / 250
Total benchmark cost
$0.02
Avg tokens / item
261

Model details

Released
2024-12-05
Weights
β€”
Context
300K
Max output
5K
Knowledge cutoff
2024-10-31
Price in
$0.06/M
Price out
$0.24/M
Modality
text+image->text

Sources: openrouter Β· meo

FAQ

How accurate is Amazon: Nova Lite 1.0?

Amazon: Nova Lite 1.0 scores 39.7% overall on the meo benchmark (rank #80 of 82), an un-leaked private holdout graded objective-first.

What is Amazon: Nova Lite 1.0's Effective Value?

Its Effective Value (𝕍) is 0.0005 at N=10, Ο‰=1, Ξ΄=1.5 β€” a fused metric of accuracy, speed, cost, and error-cascade. 𝕍 rankings shift with task depth.

How much does Amazon: Nova Lite 1.0 cost per correct answer?

About $0.0002 per correct answer (666 tokens, 5.31 seconds each) at benchmark-time pricing via OpenRouter.

Is Amazon: Nova Lite 1.0 open weights?

Open-weights status for Amazon: Nova Lite 1.0 is not recorded.

Benchmark updates affecting this model

  • 2026-06-09majorlogic_math_cs ground truth was broken β€” culled and rebuilt with solver-verified items

    A 5-lab frontier jury revealed that 29 of 37 LLM-authored logic_math_cs items had broken ground truth: on most, five independent frontier models unanimously concluded the clue sets were contradictory while the stored answer claimed a number, and on eight, all five agreed on the SAME different number (author arithmetic errors). Models were being marked wrong for being right. The 29 were retired (full audit published in the repo) and the domain rebuilt with generator-as-oracle items: an embedded constraint solver PROVES each puzzle has exactly one solution (or provably none), verified by an independent exhaustive enumerator. A 3-round difficulty study found frontier models saturate consistent human-scale logic puzzles, so items use anonymous global constraints and carry a measured difficulty gradient.

  • 2026-06-08majorCorrected base_bias grading (LLM-equivalence judge fix)

    The LLM-equivalence grader uses a reasoning model whose verdict token budget was too small, so its YES/NO answer was emitted as empty and silently counted as a failure. This understated the base_bias domain to ~7% for every model when the true accuracy is ~85-90%. We raised the judge budget, excluded its reasoning tokens from the verdict, switched to verbosity-robust conclusion matching, and re-graded the whole board.

Full benchmark changelog β†’

Embed this ranking

Show Amazon: Nova Lite 1.0’s meo rank on your site β€” the badge links back here.

Related: all Amazon models Β· Base-rate bias domain Β· best Effective Value Β· biggest movers Β· methodology Β· full leaderboard.