DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max
As of 2026-10-19: On the un-leaked meo benchmark, Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max is the more accurate of the two (81.0% vs 80.3%), while Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper per correct answer. Compared on accuracy, Effective Value (π), cost, speed, context, and pricing β all from the un-leaked meo benchmark.
| Metric | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 | Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| meo rank | #14 | #12 |
| Accuracy | 80.3% | 81.0% |
| π index (top=100) | 0.53 | 0.65 |
| $ / correct answer | $0.0182 | $0.0157 |
| Seconds / correct | 131 | 102 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Price out ($/M) | $1.91 | $4.42 |
| Open weights | Yes | β |
Green = the stronger value on that metric. π indexed to the leaderboard top = 100.
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 better than Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max?
On accuracy, Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max leads (80.3% vs 81.0%). On Effective Value (π), which weights accuracy for deep agentic chains, Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max is ahead. βBetterβ depends on whether you optimize for accuracy, cost, or speed.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max costs less per correct answer ($0.0157 vs $0.0182), which already accounts for accuracy β a cheap-but-wrong model is penalized.
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max for agentic / coding work?
For long multi-step chains, rank by Effective Value (π): Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max leads here. Accuracy compounds across steps, so the more accurate model usually wins deep agentic work even if it is slower.
Full pages: DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 (DeepSeek) Β· Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max (Qwen (Alibaba)). More: all comparisons Β· full leaderboard Β· methodology.