AI Benchmarks Catalog
Public AI benchmarks measure capability but are contamination-prone — a model may have seen the test. This catalog lists the third-party benchmarks meo aggregates as attributed secondary signals, each cross-checked against meo’s un-leaked first-party score.
The third-party AI benchmarks we aggregate and cross-reference against our first-party meo scores: Artificial Analysis indices, GPQA, MMLU-Pro, AIME, SWE-style coding, LMArena Elo, and more — each with what it measures, its license, and a per-benchmark model leaderboard.
We treat these as attributed secondary signals and cross-check them against our un-leaked first-party meo benchmark. Public benchmarks are contamination-prone; crowd arenas are gameable — see the methodology for why.
Artificial Analysis
| Benchmark | Type | License | Leaderboard |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | index | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| AA Intelligence Index | index | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| AA Math Index | index | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| AIME | accuracy | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| AIME 2025 | accuracy | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| GPQA Diamond | accuracy | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| Humanity's Last Exam | accuracy | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| IFBench | accuracy | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| LCR (long-context reasoning) | accuracy | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| LiveCodeBench | accuracy | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| MATH-500 | accuracy | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| MMLU-Pro | accuracy | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| SciCode | accuracy | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| τ²-bench | accuracy | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | accuracy | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| Median output throughput (tokens/s) | tok_s | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
| Median time to first token (s) | seconds | proprietary-attribution | View ranking → |
LMArena (Chatbot Arena)
| Benchmark | Type | License | Leaderboard |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Elo (Chatbot Arena) | elo | apache-2.0 | View ranking → |
Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai). Redistribution requires an AA commercial license.
Benchmark concepts
Plain-language explainers of key benchmarking terms.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between a public benchmark and the meo benchmark?
Public benchmarks (MMLU, GPQA, AIME) use fixed, published question sets, so a model may have seen them in training — “contamination.” The meo benchmark is generated and held out (un-leaked), so scores reflect reasoning rather than memorization. Meo treats public benchmarks as attributed secondary signals.
Are AI leaderboards like LMArena reliable?
Crowd-vote arenas such as LMArena measure human preference, which is gameable and can reward style over correctness. They are useful as one signal but should not be the only one — meo cross-references arena Elo against objective, un-leaked accuracy.
What is benchmark contamination?
Contamination is when a model’s training data includes a benchmark’s test questions, inflating its score without real capability gains. It is the main reason public-benchmark leaderboards can mislead, and why meo uses generated, un-leaked items.
Which AI benchmark should I trust?
No single one — triangulate. Use un-leaked first-party scores (like meo) for contamination-free reasoning, public academic benchmarks for breadth, and arenas for human preference, weighting them by what you are deploying. Each benchmark here links to a per-benchmark leaderboard.