Head-to-head comparison
1898 & co. vs mckinsey & company
mckinsey & company leads by 23 points on AI adoption score.
1898 & co.
Stage: Early
Key opportunity: Leverage AI to automate security assessment report generation and threat intelligence synthesis, enabling consultants to focus on higher-value advisory work and reducing project turnaround times by 40-60%.
Top use cases
- Automated Security Assessment Reports — Use LLMs to draft client-specific cybersecurity assessment reports from structured findings, reducing consultant writing…
- Threat Intelligence Synthesis — Deploy NLP pipelines to aggregate and summarize OT/ICS threat feeds, producing daily briefs tailored to each client's in…
- RFP Response Automation — Implement GenAI to generate first-draft proposals by matching past project data and consultant profiles to new RFP requi…
mckinsey & company
Stage: Advanced
Key opportunity: Deploy a firm-wide generative AI platform to synthesize decades of proprietary engagement data, accelerating insight generation and automating deliverable creation for consultants.
Top use cases
- AI-Powered Insight Engine — Leverage LLMs on McKinsey's proprietary knowledge base to provide consultants with instant, synthesized answers, benchma…
- Automated Deliverable Generation — Generate first drafts of slide decks, reports, and financial models from structured data and prompts, allowing teams to …
- Client Engagement Diagnostics — Use NLP to analyze client interview transcripts and survey data in real-time, surfacing hidden themes, sentiment risks, …
Want a private comparison report?
We'll benchmark your company against up to 5 peers with a detailed AI adoption assessment.
Request report →