Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

makro group vs epam systems

epam systems leads by 20 points on AI adoption score.

makro group
IT services & consulting · princeton, new jersey
65
C
Basic
Stage: Exploring
Key opportunity: Leveraging generative AI to automate and enhance software development, testing, and client proposal generation can significantly boost productivity and service quality for this established IT services firm.
Top use cases
  • AI-Powered Code Assistant
  • Intelligent Client Proposal Engine
  • Predictive Project Management
View full profile →
epam systems
IT services & digital engineering · newtown, pennsylvania
85
A
Advanced
Stage: Mature
Key opportunity: EPAM can leverage its deep client integration to deploy proprietary AI-powered software engineering and testing copilots, accelerating delivery and improving code quality across its global projects.
Top use cases
  • AI-Powered Development Copilot
  • Intelligent Test Automation
  • Client Operations Analytics
View full profile →
vs

Want a private comparison report?

We'll benchmark your company against up to 5 peers with a detailed AI adoption assessment.

Request report →